|
Race and Victorian Science
Benjamin Kidd, from The Control of
the Tropics (1898)
The Anglo-Irishman Benjamin
Kidd (1858–1916) was a civil servant
and amateur naturalist who became a best-selling
author with his controversial Social Evolution (1894). The
Control of the Tropics was published in
1898.
The next principle, which it seems must be no less clearly
recognized, is one which carries us a great stride forward from the past as
soon as we begin to perceived the nature of the consequences which follow from
its admission. It is that, nevertheless, there never has been, and there never
will be, within any time with which we are practically concerned, such a thing
as good government, in the European sense, of the tropics by the natives of
these regions. The ultimate fact underlying all the relations of the white man
to the tropics is one which really goes to the root of the whole question of
the evolution which the race itself has undergone. The human race reached its
earliest development where the conditions of earliest development where the
conditions of life were easiest; namely, in the tropics. But throughout the
whole period of human history the development of the race has taken place
outwards from the tropics. Slowly but surely we see the seat of empire and
authority moving like the advancing tide northward. The evolution in character
which the race has undergone has been northwards from the tropics. The first
step to the solution of the problem before us is simply to acquire the
principle that in dealing with the natural inhabitants of the tropics we
are dealing with peoples who represent the same stage in the history of the
development of the race that the child does in the history of the development
of the individual. The tropics will not, therefore, be developed by the natives
themselves. However we may be inclined to hesitate before reaching this view,
it is hard to see how assent to it can be withheld in the face of the
consistent verdict of history in the past, and the unvarying support given to
it by facts in the present. If there is any one inclined to challenge it, let
him reflect for a moment on the evidence on the one side and the difficulty
that will present itself to him of producing any serious facts on the other
side. If we look to the native social systems of the tropical East, to the
primitive savagery of Central Africa, to the West Indian Islands in the past in
process of being assisted into the position of modern States by Great Britain,
to the Black Republic of Hayti in the present, or to the Black Republic Hayti
in the present or to modern Liberia in the future, the lesson seems everywhere
the same; it is that there will be no development of the resources of the
tropics under native government.
We come, therefore, to a clearly defined position. If we have to
meet the fact that by force of circumstances the tropics must by force
of circumstances the tropics must be developed, and if the evidence is
equally be developed, and if the evidence is equally emphatic that such a
development can only take place under the influence of the white man, we are
confronted with a larger issue than any mere question of commercial policy or
of national selfishness. The tropics in such circumstances can only be governed
as a trust for civilization, and with a full sense of the responsibility which
such a trust involves. The first principle of success in undertaking such a
duty seems to the writer to be a clear recognition of the cardinal fact that in
the tropics the white man lives and works only as a diver lives and works under
water. Alike in a moral, in an ethical, and in a political sense, the
atmosphere he breathes must be that of another region, that which produced him,
and to which he belongs. Neither physically, morally, nor politically, can he
be acclimatized in the tropics. The people among whom he lives and works are
often separated from him by thousands of years of development; he cannot,
therefore, be allowed to administer government from any local and lower
standard he may develop. If he has any right there at all, he is there in the
name of civilization; if our civilization has any right there at all, it is
because it represents higher ideals of humanity, a higher type of social order.
This is the lesson which, slowly and painfully, and with many a temporary
reversion to older ideas, the British peoples have been learning in India for
the last fifty years, and which has recently been applied in other
circumstances to the government of Egypt.
|